SellYourAIData.com
Get started Contact
MARKET RATES

Understand what moves the price.

Data is not a commodity with one universal price. Quality, context, rights, and contract terms all matter.

Put context beside every number
Unexplained figure

Unit left undefined

Transaction stage unclear

Useful evidence

Scope and terms

Source and status

Illustrative comparison
VALUE DRIVERS · COMMUNICATIONS

Threads preserve decisions and outcomes.

Evaluate context, continuity, historical depth and rights. A size-based illustration cannot predict the value of a particular archive.

VALUE DRIVERS · SUPPORT TICKETS

Resolutions connect a problem with its outcome.

Evaluate issue diversity, completeness, resolution labels and preparation requirements. A per-ticket illustration is not comparable with a repository price.

VALUE DRIVERS · CODE REPOSITORIES

History explains the change, not just the code.

Evaluate authorship, license dependencies, review context and tests. Repository size alone does not determine price.

How to read the evidence

Examples below are illustrative figures from the original design, not live quotes or verified market averages. Do not compare different units as if they measure the same thing.

Read evidence methodology →

A useful starting point

Communications, support tickets, and repositories are assessed differently. Per-ticket, per-terabyte, and per-repository figures cannot be compared directly. The figures below are the original design’s illustrative examples, not verified market rates or buyer quotes.

Market rates

Illustrative pricing examples, by data type.

See all market rates →
{{ r.name }}
{{ r.desc }}
Common sources
{{ s.letter }}
{{ r.title }}

{{ r.text }}

{{ r.unit }}EXAMPLE
{{ b.name }} {{ b.note }}{{ b.range }}

From example to evidence

A publishable benchmark needs the source, date, dataset scope, pricing unit, volume, contract terms, and whether the price was offered, contracted, or paid. Read the methodology →

Find out what your data is worth.

Start with your company and the tools you use.

Get my valuation →
01START WITH THE UNIT

Different records need different measures

A pricing figure is only meaningful when you know what it measures. A per-ticket illustration describes a different unit from a per-repository or size-based illustration. Even within one category, a record can mean different things: a single message, a complete conversation, a resolved case, or an archive containing many related events. Establish the unit before comparing any numbers or estimating a total.

The category switch highlights different value drivers while retaining the original design’s illustrative examples. Those figures are not live quotes, verified market averages, or evidence of completed SellYourAIData transactions. Use them to understand why categories are evaluated differently. Do not multiply an example by the size of your archive and interpret the result as an offer or a prediction of what a buyer will pay.

Units describe different records
CategoryClarify the unit
CommunicationsMessage or conversation?
SupportTicket or resolution?
CodeSnapshot or repository?
Example planning view
02CONTEXT AND QUALITY

Explain why the archive is useful

Volume can describe scale, but it does not establish usefulness. A conversation archive may preserve decisions and outcomes, or it may contain disconnected messages. Support records may include clear resolutions or end without a documented result. A repository may include review history and tests, or only a final snapshot. Describe the context that exists rather than assuming all records in a category have equivalent value.

Quality also depends on consistency and interpretation. Note gaps in the timeline, duplicate records, changes in tools, and fields that were used differently across teams. Explain whether a reviewer could connect the important parts without extensive reconstruction. These characteristics help frame a specific evaluation. They do not produce a universal multiplier, and this site does not claim that a particular feature guarantees a higher price.

What makes the archive interpretable
Useful context
01Decisions connected clearly
02Outcomes recorded consistently
03Historical gaps explained
04Review effort understood
Illustrative connected archive
03RIGHTS AND SCOPE

Compare the complete commercial request

A quoted amount can reflect the scope of rights as well as the records themselves. Ask what uses are permitted, which recipients are included, how long the license lasts, and whether exclusivity limits future options. Two offers for the same archive may involve different commitments. Keep those commitments beside the numbers so the comparison does not hide the reason one proposal differs from another.

Preparation and acceptance can also change the practical result. Determine who identifies the authorized records, reviews restricted material, explains the structure, and prepares the transfer. Ask what happens if the delivered material does not meet the agreed requirements. Those operational details belong in a commercial comparison because they affect both effort and uncertainty. Do not treat them as minor details to resolve after relying on a headline amount.

Rights change the proposal
USEPermitted activitiesRecipients defined
TERMLicense durationExclusivity considered
WORKPreparation responsibilitiesAcceptance explicit
Example record structure
04FROM EXAMPLE TO EVIDENCE

Know which event a figure describes

An indication of interest, a bid, a signed agreement, and a completed payment are different events. A useful market record identifies which event the evidence supports, along with the source, date, unit, scope, and relevant terms. Without that context, a striking number can create a misleading impression of what happened or what another company should expect from an unrelated archive.

If you have information to contribute, use the deal report tool to prepare a structured local brief. Include enough context to make the number understandable without disclosing restricted contract details. Downloading that brief does not submit it for review or add it to this page. The methodology explains the evidence distinctions so future conversations can separate illustrations, unreviewed reports, and information supported by a specific source.

Identify the event behind figures
  1. 01
    Offer proposedConditions still open
  2. 02
    Agreement signedCommitments recorded separately
  3. 03
    Payment completedEvidence supports stage
Illustrative workflow